There’s
some confusion regarding this sword (Wallace
Collection inv.# A.466).
In Norman’s and
Mann’s ”European Arms and Armour in the Wallace
Collection”, the
pommel is said to be of bronze, and the cross of copper, while Oakeshott claims
in “Records of the Medieval Sword” that the pommel is gilt iron, and the
copper cross might be a 19th century replacement. He sets the
manufacture of the sword to the years 1440-60, which is a bit earlier than most
other estimates. David Edge, on the other hand, says in ”European Arms and
Armour” that the pommel and cross are made from some copper alloy, and that
the sword can be dated to the years 1450-75. The latest bid is that the pommel
is bronze (probably hollow), and that the cross is copper. Unofficially, the
cross is regarded as a 19th century replacement, as well as the
well-shaped horn grip, while the rest of the sword is the genuine article. This
would make the sword a composite, something it shares with a lot of other
weapons and armour that wound up in collections in the 19th century.
Anyhow, the sword is extremely attractive, with a blade in very good condition.
A couple of copper marks are inlaid on each side of the blade, c. 20 cm/8”
from the cross, and the point is reinforced for improved penetration. The sword
is very pleasant to handle.
Maker's mark
Close-up of the hilt
Detail of the pommel
Oakeshott classification:
Blade type: XVIII
Pommel type: V
Cross-style: 2, knobbed
Dimensions:
Length: 1055 mm (41.5”)
Blade length: 890 mm (35”)
Blade width: 41 mm at the base (1.6”)
Pommel, height: 65 mm (2.56”), width 60 mm (2.36”)
Width of cross: 160 mm (6.3”)
Point of balance: 110 mm (4.33”) from the cross
Location of primary node: c. 560 mm (22”) from the cross
Weight: 1340 grams ( 2 lbs 15 oz)
James G. Mann & A.V.B. Norman: European Arms and
Armour in the Wallace Collection, p. 244 (vol. 1), p. 114 (vol. 2)
Ewart Oakeshott:
Records of the Medieval Sword, p. 179